In the former, Ptolemy wrote that the science of the stars has two aspects, one that determines the position of the stars and the other that determines their influence. Ptolemaeos, known better by the English version of his name, Ptolemy, wrote the definitive volumes on both Greek astrology, his Apotelesmatiká ( Ἀποτελεσματικά) or Tetrabiblos, and Greek astronomy, his Mathēmatikē Syntaxis ( Μαθηματικὴ Σύνταξις) or Almagest.
This development reached its zenith in the second century CE in the work of Claudius Ptolemaeos, antiquity’s greatest astronomer. Shifting from algebraic to geometrical models the Greeks continued to develop astronomy, like the Babylonians, in the service of astrology. Depiction of Ptolomy the astrologer, dated 1554. In the second half of the first millennium BCE the ancient Greeks adopted the whole package, astrology and astronomy, from their Babylonian neighbours. These extraordinary achievements in what we call astronomy were all driven by the Babylonian obsession with what we call astrology. Eclipses of the sun are somewhat more difficult, and the Babylonians could predict when they might take place but couldn’t identify the ones that wouldn’t because of failing alignments. The Babylonians developed their study of the stars and their influences reaching a point where they could accurately follow the paths of the planets and predict with accuracy eclipses of the moon, all done with algebraic algorithms. However, to determine that influence the observers had to track the patterns of those celestial objects and so astronomy was born. Awed by this majestic display of dancing lights, they began to wonder if they in some way influenced or controlled life on the earth down below. I think that what first happened is that people looked up at the night sky – don’t forget that there was no light pollution –, and went wow! Continuing to observe over a longer period, they noticed that the stars revolved in regular circles and a handful of special ones, the planets, weaved a sort of regular path through the others. Like the chicken and the egg it’s impossible to say which came first, astrology or astronomy (though I recently read that evolutionary biologists have determined that the egg came first). Over a period of something between three and four thousand years, astronomy and astrology were not rivals or competitors but two sides of the same coin, Siamese twins joined at the hip only separated in the final phases of the so-called scientific revolution. Whilst as a non-believer I have some sympathy, I often ask myself if those harsh critics are aware of the central role that astrology played in the historical evolution of science in general and astronomy in particular, from the early days in ancient Babylon down to the end of the seventeenth century. Supporters of science, especially those who believe that empirical science is the only purveyor of truth in the world, like to poke fun at astrology as the prime example of a load of old rubbish with pretensions to non-scientific truth. He runs the blog, The Renaissance Mathematicus, and he was the editor of Whewell’s Gazette. The final part of the presentation was devoted to educational practices within which children's perceptions of the heliocentric system were problematized.Thony Christie (Twitter handle is a British-born historian of early modern science and mathematics currently living in Franconia, Germany. At the turn of the century one of its most famous adherents, Leo Tolstoy, was contemplating a refutation of the Copernican system, being influenced by the writings of Schöpfer.
Arguing to the contrary, the speakers examined a number of later anti-Copernican texts, focusing on the popular books of the German writer Karl Schöpfer («Die Erde steht fest», 1853 «Die Widersprüche in der Astronomie», 1869), and pointed out some of the preconditions for their appearance - in particular, the tradition of Rousseauistic criticism of science. According to historians of cosmological ideas (such as Dorothy Stimson and Boris Raikov), in the first half of the 19th century, the controversy over the Copernican system was by and large exhausted.
#HISTORY OF HELIOCENTRIC ASTROLOGY PROFESSIONAL#
The starting point of the presentation was the opposition between Sherlock Holmes (the hero, who does not want to know about the Copernican system for practical reasons) and Professor Moriarty (the villain, who is a professional mathematician and astronomer) that captures several distinctive features of the attitude towards heliocentrism in the intellectual culture of the second half of the 19th and early 20th centuries.
0 kommentar(er)
